What is the implication of a contract being "voidable"?

Get more with Examzify Plus

Remove ads, unlock favorites, save progress, and access premium tools across devices.

FavoritesSave progressAd-free
From $9.99Learn more

Prepare for the Champions Law of Contracts Exam with study materials including flashcards and multiple choice questions. Each question provides hints and explanations. Ace your exam!

A contract being "voidable" implies that it is initially valid and enforceable, but one party has the legal right to cancel or rescind the contract due to specific circumstances, such as misrepresentation, undue influence, or the party being a minor. This unilateral right means that only the affected party can choose to void the contract; the other party remains bound unless the contract is formally voided.

This characteristic of voidable contracts empowers one party with the option to affirm or reject the contract based on their situation, which is crucial in understanding the dynamics of enforceability and obligations in contract law. It distinguishes voidable contracts from void contracts, which are inherently invalid from the outset, with no enforceability by either party. Therefore, the correct answer reflects the unilateral nature of the right to void the agreement.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy